Home News Google Settles for $1.67 Billion in Singular Computing AI Tech Patent Trial

Google Settles for $1.67 Billion in Singular Computing AI Tech Patent Trial

Google has recently reached a settlement in a high-profile patent infringement lawsuit with Singular Computing, just as the closing arguments in the trial were about to begin. The lawsuit, which sought $1.67 billion in damages, accused Google of misusing Singular Computing’s computer-processing innovations in its AI technology.

Key Highlights

  • Google and Singular Computing reached a settlement in a patent lawsuit, avoiding the conclusion of the trial.
  • Singular Computing sought $1.67 billion in damages for Google’s alleged misuse of its AI chip technology.
  • The settlement’s details are not disclosed, but both parties confirmed the resolution.
  • Google’s spokesperson asserted no violation of Singular’s patent rights.
  • The dispute centered on Google’s Tensor Processing Units, allegedly incorporating technology shared by Joseph Bates, Singular’s founder, between 2010 and 2014.

Background of the Lawsuit

Singular Computing, led by Massachusetts-based computer scientist Joseph Bates, claimed that Google incorporated Bates’ technology into their processing units. These units support AI features in various Google services such as Google Search, Gmail, and Google Translate. Bates allegedly shared his inventions with Google between 2010 and 2014. The lawsuit, filed in 2019, contended that Google’s Tensor Processing Units, launched in 2016, infringed two of Bates’ patents. Singular specifically pointed to versions 2 and 3 of these units, released in 2017 and 2018, as violating its patent rights.

Google’s Defense

Google’s response to the allegations was robust. The company’s now-chief scientist, Jeff Dean, had shown interest in Bates’ ideas, as revealed in internal emails. However, Google maintained that its employees who designed the chips had never met Bates and that the technology was developed independently. Google emphasized that its technology was “fundamentally different than what is described in Singular’s patents.”

Settlement and Statements

While the details of the settlement remain undisclosed, representatives from both Google and Singular have confirmed its occurrence. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda stated the company is pleased with the resolution and reiterated that Google did not violate Singular’s patent rights.

Implications of the Settlement

The settlement of this case averts what could have been a significant financial and reputational blow to Google. It also highlights the intricate and often contentious nature of patent rights in the rapidly evolving field of AI technology. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of intellectual property rights and the complexities involved in their enforcement in the tech industry.


The Google-Singular Computing settlement brings to an end a contentious legal battle over AI technology patents. The case underscores the challenges in navigating intellectual property in the tech world, particularly in areas as complex and rapidly advancing as AI. The undisclosed settlement marks a significant moment in the tech industry, reflecting both the value and sensitivity of AI-related innovations.